Note-Taking and Personal Knowledge
Everybody takes notes and almost nobody is taught how. This course is about the part that can be checked: what the evidence says about writing notes by hand against typing them, what the encoding and the external-storage functions of a note actually are and why the two pull in different directions, what happens to a note you never look at again, and what a personal knowledge system has to do to earn the time it costs. Its spine is one argument in three lessons: the most famous result in the subject, what happened when two teams checked it, and five meta-analyses of the same question that give five different answers. It takes retrieval practice and spacing from How to Learn Anything and the reconstructive account from Memory rather than re-teaching either. It is the fifth course of the term on running yourself.
What you'll learn
- Distinguish the encoding function of a note from the external-storage function, and say which one a described note is serving
- State what proportion of what is presented ends up in a note, and why a count of a note means nothing without its denominator
- State what the longhand-against-laptop study found, at what read level, and which half of it survived a direct replication
- Read a table of meta-analytic effect sizes and say what five different answers to one question mean
- Say what a measurement of brain activity licenses about a claim on learning, and what it does not
- Design a review routine for notes, and evaluate a personal knowledge system against the time it costs to maintain
- Read a claim about note-taking and say what would have had to be measured, and where
Syllabus
- 1What a note is for100 min
- 2What a note actually contains70 min
- 3The famous study, and how to hold it80 min
- 4What happened when people checked80 min
- 5Five meta-analyses, one question85 min
- 6What a brain scan can and cannot tell you80 min
- 7Keeping a note you will use again95 min
- 8Reading a claim about your notes95 min